Post by account_disabled on Mar 7, 2024 2:01:05 GMT -5
The National Forum of Federal Public Advocacy, made up of entities that represent Federal Public Advocacy (Anajur, Anpaf, Anpprev, Apbc, Apaferj and Sinprofaz), reinforced in a note the dissatisfaction against the government's stance in giving different treatment to certain careers in the forecast budget.
The note refers to the approval, on Wednesday (/), by the Constitution, Justice and Citizenship Committee of the Chamber of Deputies of the budget amendment for the Positions and Salaries Plan for employees of the Judiciary and the Public Ministry and to increase the allowance of ministers of the Federal Supreme Court. The amendment will be forwarded to the Joint Committee on Plans, Budget BTC Number Data and Inspection of the National Congress, which will analyze the budget proposal for
The Commission also approved an amendment requested by the president of the TST, minister João Oreste Dalazen, in the amount of R$ million, intended for the modernization of the physical facilities of the Labor Court.
The Forum informs that it will not allow different treatment between essential functions of Justice. And it clarifies that it will adopt all possible measures so that the Budget includes provision for the restructuring of AGU Careers, as well as so that article , X, of CF/, is fulfilled equally.
According to the Forum, the approval by the CCJ of the Chamber and the Senate of an amendment contemplating a budget forecast to enable readjustments to other careers that are part of the essential functions of Justice requires equal treatment in relation to the Federal Public Lawyers.
The note also maintains that in a Democratic State of Law, the primacy of the Constitution and laws must always be observed. Article , § , of the ADCT, and Chapter IV, of Title IV, of the Magna Carta, make clear the equal treatment between the Essential Functions of Justice. “Added to this is the provisions of article , XII, of CF/, which determines that the remunerations between the Legislative and Judiciary Powers cannot be higher than the Executive Power." According to the Forum, Senate lawyers have equal remuneration for judges and members of the Public Ministry, which is why this precept is required in relation to the Federal Public Advocacy.
The note refers to the approval, on Wednesday (/), by the Constitution, Justice and Citizenship Committee of the Chamber of Deputies of the budget amendment for the Positions and Salaries Plan for employees of the Judiciary and the Public Ministry and to increase the allowance of ministers of the Federal Supreme Court. The amendment will be forwarded to the Joint Committee on Plans, Budget BTC Number Data and Inspection of the National Congress, which will analyze the budget proposal for
The Commission also approved an amendment requested by the president of the TST, minister João Oreste Dalazen, in the amount of R$ million, intended for the modernization of the physical facilities of the Labor Court.
The Forum informs that it will not allow different treatment between essential functions of Justice. And it clarifies that it will adopt all possible measures so that the Budget includes provision for the restructuring of AGU Careers, as well as so that article , X, of CF/, is fulfilled equally.
According to the Forum, the approval by the CCJ of the Chamber and the Senate of an amendment contemplating a budget forecast to enable readjustments to other careers that are part of the essential functions of Justice requires equal treatment in relation to the Federal Public Lawyers.
The note also maintains that in a Democratic State of Law, the primacy of the Constitution and laws must always be observed. Article , § , of the ADCT, and Chapter IV, of Title IV, of the Magna Carta, make clear the equal treatment between the Essential Functions of Justice. “Added to this is the provisions of article , XII, of CF/, which determines that the remunerations between the Legislative and Judiciary Powers cannot be higher than the Executive Power." According to the Forum, Senate lawyers have equal remuneration for judges and members of the Public Ministry, which is why this precept is required in relation to the Federal Public Advocacy.